top of page
Search

How to Reduce Average Handle Time (AHT): Definitive Strategies to Lower AHT Without Sacrificing Quality

  • Writer: DM Monticello
    DM Monticello
  • Nov 7
  • 6 min read
ree

The Strategic Imperative: Mastering AHT for Efficiency and Experience

In the high-stakes world of customer experience (CX) and contact center operations, Average Handling Time (AHT) is the most critical metric for assessing operational efficiency and managing costs. A low AHT translates directly into higher agent productivity and lower operational expenses, as more customer interactions can be managed by the same sized workforce. A single second shaved off the average can save thousands of dollars annually in large contact centers.

However, the pursuit of a low AHT presents a perennial challenge: the need to balance speed with quality. Rushing a customer to lower the call center handling time can severely damage Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) and lead to costly repeat calls (poor First Call Resolution or FCR). This guide breaks down the true meaning of AHT, details the universal formula, analyzes the current average AHT in contact centers by industry, and provides actionable, technology-driven strategies to lower AHT without compromising the quality of the customer experience.



Section 1: Decoding Average Handling Time (AHT) and Its Core Components

Understanding call center average handle time begins with recognizing that it measures the entire lifecycle of a customer interaction, from the moment the agent begins engaging until all administrative work is complete.

A. The Universal AHT Formula

AHT is calculated by summing the total time spent working on customer interactions across a measured period and dividing that sum by the total number of interactions handled.

$$\text{AHT} = \frac{(\text{Total Talk Time} + \text{Total Hold Time} + \text{Total After-Call Work})}{\text{Total Number of Interactions Handled}}$$

B. The Three Critical Components of AHT: Where Time is Lost

To implement effective strategies to lower AHT, managers must break down and target inefficiencies in each component:

  1. Talk Time (TT): The time agents spend actively speaking with customers.

    • Optimization Target: Improving agent training and product knowledge to ensure the representative can deliver a precise, single solution without excessive verbal filler.

  2. Hold Time (HT): The total time the customer spends on hold. This often signals deficiencies in the agent's ability to quickly access information or subject matter experts (SMEs).

    • Optimization Target: Improving knowledge base accessibility and internal communication (e.g., using collaborative tools to query a subject matter expert without placing the customer on hold).

  3. After-Call Work (ACW): All administrative tasks performed immediately after the call ends (notes, logging, follow-up emails).

    • Optimization Target: Automation, using AI to generate call summaries and automatically update the CRM, thereby eliminating manual data entry.



Section 2: Strategic Optimization: How to Reduce Average Handle Time (AHT)

The greatest challenge in managing AHT is the inherent conflict between speed (low AHT) and resolution quality (high FCR/CSAT). To successfully deploy strategies to lower AHT, the focus must be placed on empowering the agent with knowledge and automating routine steps.

A. Agent-Centric Strategies (Coaching and Knowledge)

  1. Enhance Agent Training and Coaching (BST): Investing in comprehensive, ongoing training is the top way to improve AHT. Use Behavioral Skills Training (BST) techniques, such as role-playing exercises and listening to call recordings of top performers, to standardize efficient handling techniques and develop effective call control strategies.

  2. Optimize the Knowledge Base (KMS): Create a robust, easily searchable, and centrally accessible Knowledge Management System (KMS) that gives agents instant answers to complex queries, eliminating the time wasted searching or placing customers on hold. The KMS should be updated regularly based on new products and recurring issues.

  3. Standardize and Streamline Communication: Train agents in effective communication techniques, including asking for a full explanation upfront and repeating a summary of the issue back to the customer. This simple act of verification reduces subsequent miscommunication and callback rates.

B. Technology and Automation Strategies (Targeting HT & ACW)

Modern AHT optimization relies heavily on integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and conversational intelligence (CI) tools:

  1. Automate After-Call Work (ACW): This is the biggest opportunity for quick gains. Utilize AI solutions to automatically tag, categorize, and generate a summary of the call. This automated documentation can reduce After-Call Work by as much as 33%.

  2. Implement Agent Assist Tools: Conversational Intelligence (CI) software listens to the live call and provides the agent with real-time suggestions, next-best-action recommendations, and instant knowledge base retrieval. This reduces both Talk Time (TT) and Hold Time (HT) simultaneously.

  3. Optimize Routing and Self-Service: AI-powered IVR systems handle routine inquiries, and skill-based routing ensures the caller is matched with the agent most likely to solve the problem on the first call (increasing FCR and avoiding transfers). Self-service options should also be expanded to filter out low-complexity calls.



Section 3: The Interconnected Metrics Ecosystem

The isolated AHT metric provides an incomplete picture of operational success. The best call handling performance metrics are viewed as an interconnected ecosystem, where optimizing one metric (AHT) must not be allowed to degrade others (Quality and Resolution).

A. The AHT vs. FCR/CSAT Relationship

The best practice is to view AHT, First Call Resolution (FCR), and Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) as complementary metrics, not conflicting ones.

  • FCR (First Call Resolution): High FCR reduces AHT in the long run by eliminating costly repeat calls and subsequent handling time.

  • CSAT (Customer Satisfaction Score): If AHT drops because agents are rushing, CSAT typically declines because customers feel unheard or receive incomplete solutions.

  • Optimal Strategy: The goal is not the lowest AHT, but the AHT that maximizes FCR and CSAT, known as the "optimal AHT" for that specific call type.

B. Industry Benchmarks for Average AHT in Contact Centers

What constitutes a "good" average AHT in contact centers is not a universal metric; it varies drastically based on the industry and the complexity of the interaction. The industry standard across all sectors is often quoted at around six minutes.

Industry/Call Type

Typical AHT Range

Complexity Driver

Technical Support (Tier 2)

10 – 20 minutes

Requires deep diagnostics, remote access, and root cause analysis.

Healthcare & Insurance

8 – 12 minutes

Compliance (HIPAA), sensitive data handling, and complex multi-step processes (e.g., claims processing).

Financial Services

6 – 10 minutes

High security/verification requirements, detailed account inquiries, and legal compliance.

Retail & E-commerce

4 – 6 minutes

High volume of simpler, transactional queries (e.g., tracking an order, checking inventory).



Section 4: Strategic Workforce Management and Outsourcing

For large organizations, managing a high volume of interactions requires viewing support as a strategic operational discipline. This is where strategic outsourcing becomes essential for optimizing costs and maintaining 24/7 service.

A. Strategic Outsourcing for Risk Mitigation

Companies frequently delegate call center and customer support functions to specialized providers to manage complex operational challenges:

  • Cost Control and Scale: Outsourcing allows businesses to convert high fixed costs (salaries, benefits, infrastructure) into variable, scalable costs, paying only for the support that is needed.

  • 24/7 Coverage: Specialized Managed Service Providers (MSPs) use global remote talent pools to provide crucial 24/7 coverage across multiple time zones, ensuring that business continuity is maintained regardless of location.

  • Expertise Access: Outsourcing provides immediate access to specialized skills (e.g., Tier 2 technical support) that are locally scarce.

B. Supporting Operational Efficiency with Virtual Talent

OpsArmy supports the entire remote operations lifecycle, ensuring that businesses can successfully hire, manage, and pay their specialized remote workforce.



Conclusion

Mastering the goal of how to reduce average handle time is essential for maintaining a competitive edge in customer service. Success is achieved not by forcing agents to rush, but by strategically optimizing the AHT components: improving agent training, investing in accessible knowledge bases, and deploying AI and automation tools to minimize Hold Time and After-Call Work. By finding the optimal balance between speed and quality, organizations can reduce costs, boost FCR, and deliver a consistently exceptional customer experience, ultimately transforming their contact center into a driver of business loyalty and efficiency.



About OpsArmy

OpsArmy is building AI-native back office operations as a service (OaaS). We help businesses run their day-to-day operations with AI-augmented teams, delivering outcomes across sales, admin, finance, and hiring. In a world where every team is expected to do more with less, OpsArmy provides fully managed “Ops Pods” that blend deep knowledge experts, structured playbooks, and AI copilots. 👉 Visit https://www.operationsarmy.com to learn more.



Sources


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page