top of page
Search

Call Handling Performance Metrics: Why Your Average Call Handle Time Appears to Be Stable (And How to Optimise It)

  • Writer: DM Monticello
    DM Monticello
  • Nov 7
  • 7 min read
ree

The Strategic Imperative: Mastering AHT for Efficiency and Experience

In the high-stakes world of customer experience (CX) and contact center operations, Average Handling Time (AHT) is the most critical metric for assessing operational efficiency and managing costs. When management observes that your average call handle time appears to be stable, it signals operational consistency—a necessary, but insufficient, condition for success. Stability is good for predictability, but it can also mask underlying inefficiencies and signal a plateau in agent performance and process optimization.

The true challenge for contact center leaders is moving beyond mere stability to achieve optimal AHT—a time benchmark that balances the speed of service delivery with the quality of the resolution. This comprehensive 2000-word guide breaks down the paradox of AHT stability, details the universal formula and core components, analyzes the ecosystem of call handling performance metrics (FCR, CSAT, QA), and provides actionable, technology-driven strategies to reduce handling time without compromising the quality of the customer experience.



Section 1: Decoding Average Handling Time (AHT) and Its Stability Paradox

Understanding the true meaning of average handling time requires recognizing that it measures the entire lifecycle of a customer interaction, not just the conversation itself.

A. The Universal AHT Formula

AHT is calculated by summing the total time spent working on customer interactions across a measured period and dividing that sum by the total number of interactions handled.

AHT = (Total Talk Time + Total Hold Time + Total After-Call Work) ÷ Total Number of Interactions Handled

B. The Three Critical Components of AHT

To optimize AHT, managers must break down and target each component, as inefficiencies in any area will inflate the total handling time:

  1. Talk Time (TT): The time agents spend actively speaking with customers.

    • Optimization Target: Improving agent training and product knowledge to ensure the representative can deliver a precise, single solution without excessive searching or verbal filler.

  2. Hold Time (HT): The time the customer spends on hold while the agent looks up information or consults a supervisor.

    • Optimization Target: Improving knowledge base accessibility and internal communication (e.g., using collaborative tools to query a subject matter expert without placing the customer on hold).

  3. After-Call Work (ACW): All administrative tasks performed immediately after the call ends, such as updating customer records, sending follow-up emails, or logging details in the CRM.

    • Optimization Target: Automation, using AI to generate call summaries and automatically update the CRM, thereby eliminating manual data entry.

C. The Paradox of AHT Stability

When your average call handle time appears to be stable (e.g., consistently 360 seconds), it signals control, but also potential stagnation:

  • Positive Interpretation (Consistency): It confirms that training, staffing levels, and standard processes are consistent. The variability is low, which is good for workforce management (WFM) and forecasting.

  • Negative Interpretation (Stagnation): It often indicates that agents have settled into a routine and are operating at a performance plateau. No further process improvements, technological integrations (like AI), or training methods have been implemented or internalized to drive the average time down. Stability means no visible waste, but also no visible progress.



Section 2: Beyond AHT—Key Call Handling Performance Metrics

The isolated AHT metric provides an incomplete picture of operational success. The best call handling performance metrics are viewed as an interconnected ecosystem, where optimizing one metric (AHT) must not be allowed to degrade others (Quality and Resolution).

A. The Interconnected Metrics Ecosystem

Metric

Definition

Relationship to AHT

First Call Resolution (FCR)

Percentage of customer issues resolved during the first interaction (Industry Benchmark: ~68%).

Inverse Relationship: High FCR reduces AHT in the long run by eliminating costly repeat calls and subsequent handling time.

Customer Satisfaction (CSAT)

Measures customer happiness, often collected via post-call surveys.

Inverse Relationship: If AHT drops because agents are rushing, CSAT typically declines because customers feel unheard or receive incomplete solutions.

Quality Score (QA)

Measures agent adherence to ethical standards, communication protocol, and compliance.

Direct Relationship: Poor QA leads to errors that require follow-up calls, inflating total operational time and cost, even if a single AHT appears stable.

B. Analyzing the Root Cause of Stable but High AHT

If your average call handle time appears to be stable but above the industry benchmark (e.g., stable at 800 seconds when the benchmark is 600), the root cause is usually systemic:

  1. Process Fragmentation: Agents waste time switching between multiple, non-integrated platforms (CRM, ticketing system, knowledge base).

  2. Knowledge Gaps: The Knowledge Management System (KMS) is poor or inaccessible, forcing agents to place customers on hold to consult peers or supervisors.

  3. Inefficient Scripts/Ramp-Up: Outdated training or rigid scripts force agents into unnecessary conversational paths, inflating Talk Time.



Section 3: Strategic Optimization: Reducing AHT Without Sacrificing Quality

To achieve optimal AHT, focus must be placed on empowering the agent with knowledge and using technology to automate the non-cognitive components of the interaction.

A. Empowering the Agent (People and Process)

  1. Mandate Advanced Agent Training and Coaching: Invest in comprehensive training and ongoing coaching, using role-playing exercises and listening to call recordings of top performers to standardize efficient handling techniques. Target new staff aggressively to prevent bad habits from forming.

  2. Implement Call Control Strategies: Train agents in effective call control strategies, including asking for a full explanation upfront and repeating a summary of the issue back to the customer to ensure alignment and minimize back-and-forth.

  3. Optimize the Knowledge Base: Create a robust, easily searchable, and centrally accessible Knowledge Management System (KMS) that gives agents instant answers to complex queries, eliminating the time wasted searching or placing customers on hold.

B. Leveraging AI and Automation (Technology)

AI targets AHT reduction across all three components (Talk, Hold, and ACW):

  1. Automate After-Call Work (ACW): Use AI to automatically tag, categorize, and generate a summary of the call. This automated documentation can reduce After-Call Work by as much as 33%, allowing agents to move immediately to the next customer.

  2. Implement Agent Assist Tools: Conversational Intelligence (CI) software listens to the live call and provides the agent with real-time suggestions, next-best-action recommendations, and instant knowledge base retrieval. This reduces both Talk Time and Hold Time.

  3. Optimize Routing: AI-powered IVR systems handle routine inquiries, and predictive routing engines use customer data to match the caller with the agent most likely to solve the problem on the first call (increasing FCR and avoiding transfers).



Section 4: Strategic Workforce Management and Outsourcing

For large organizations, managing a high volume of interactions requires viewing support as a strategic operational discipline. This is where strategic outsourcing becomes essential for optimizing costs and maintaining 24/7 service.

A. Strategic Outsourcing for Risk Mitigation

Companies frequently delegate call center and customer support functions to specialized providers to manage complex operational challenges:

  • Cost Control and Scale: Outsourcing allows businesses to convert high fixed costs (salaries, benefits, infrastructure) into variable, scalable costs, paying only for the support that is needed.

  • 24/7 Coverage: Specialized Managed Service Providers (MSPs) use global remote talent pools to provide crucial 24/7 coverage across multiple time zones, ensuring that business continuity is maintained regardless of location.

  • Expertise Access: Outsourcing provides immediate access to specialized skills (e.g., Tier 2 technical support) that are locally scarce.

B. Supporting Operational Efficiency with Virtual Talent

OpsArmy supports the entire remote operations lifecycle, ensuring that businesses can successfully hire, manage, and pay their specialized remote workforce.



Conclusion

When your average call handle time appears to be stable, it’s a cue for managers to deepen their focus from consistency to optimization. Mastering AHT is essential for maintaining a competitive edge in customer service, but it must be viewed within the context of call handling performance metrics like FCR and CSAT. Success is achieved not by forcing agents to rush, but by strategically optimizing the AHT components: improving agent training, investing in accessible knowledge bases, and deploying AI and automation tools to minimize Hold Time and After-Call Work. By finding the optimal balance between speed and quality, organizations can reduce costs, boost FCR, and deliver a consistently exceptional customer experience, ultimately transforming their contact center into a driver of business loyalty and efficiency.



About OpsArmy

OpsArmy is building AI-native back office operations as a service (OaaS). We help businesses run their day-to-day operations with AI-augmented teams, delivering outcomes across sales, admin, finance, and hiring. In a world where every team is expected to do more with less, OpsArmy provides fully managed “Ops Pods” that blend deep knowledge experts, structured playbooks, and AI copilots. 👉 Visit https://www.operationsarmy.com to learn more.



Sources


 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page